Pax Plus Vs Arizer XQ2

In the evolving world of vaporizers, choosing the right device can be a complex decision, influenced by various factors including features, performance, and personal preferences. The Pax Plus and the Arizer XQ2 are two prominent contenders in the market, each boasting unique attributes and catering to different user needs.

In this comprehensive comparison, I aim to dissect and analyze the key features of both these devices, drawing from my personal experiences to provide an insightful perspective. This will include a detailed look at aspects such as design, functionality, vapor quality, and overall user experience.

My goal is to offer a clear and balanced view, helping potential users make an informed decision based on their individual vaping preferences and lifestyle. Whether you’re a seasoned vaper or new to the scene, this comparison should serve as a valuable guide in selecting the vaporizer that best suits your needs.

My Experience with Pax Plus

My journey with the Pax Plus has been quite the adventure, marked by its compact design and ease of use. Its sleek, metal body not only looks premium but also feels durable, making it a reliable companion for my daily activities. From my experience, the simplicity of the one-button control on the Pax Plus adds to its charm, allowing for straightforward operation without the fuss of complex settings. The LED indicators, though minimalistic, provide just enough visual feedback to understand the device’s status.

The vapor quality delivered by the Pax Plus is dense and smooth, a testament to its well-designed conduction heating system. However, I noticed that the flavor, while good, could vary depending on the herb used. The device’s portability is a significant plus, fitting easily in my pocket and being ready for use almost anywhere.

Things I liked:

  • Compact and portable design
  • Durable metal body
  • Simple one-button control
  • Good vapor quality
  • LED indicators for ease of use

Things I didn’t like:

  • Limited temperature control
  • Flavor quality varies with different herbs
  • Battery life could be longer
  • No mobile app compatibility
  • Lack of precision in temperature settings

My Experience with Arizer XQ2

The Arizer XQ2 has been an impressive experience, especially with its advanced ceramic convection heater that delivers exceptionally clean and flavorful vapor. The precision temperature control allows for a tailored vaping experience, letting me dial in the exact settings for different herbs. From my experience, the large color LCD display of the Arizer XQ2 is a standout feature, offering clear visibility and easy adjustments, which significantly enhances the user experience.

Its design, while larger and less portable than the Pax Plus, feels sophisticated and well-suited for home use. The additional accessories, including the remote control and various attachments, make the XQ2 a versatile device, catering to a wide range of vaping preferences. However, the lack of portability due to its size and reliance on a power outlet can be a limitation for those who prefer a mobile vaping experience.

Things I liked:

  • Precise temperature control
  • High-quality, clean vapor
  • Large, easy-to-read LCD display
  • Wide range of accessories
  • Advanced ceramic convection heating

Things I didn’t like:

  • Less portable due to larger size
  • Dependent on the power outlet
  • Longer heat-up time compared to Pax Plus
  • No mobile app compatibility
  • Higher price point than some competitors


When considering a new vaporizer, price is often a crucial factor. The Pax Plus comes at a cost of $225, whereas the Arizer XQ2 is priced at $199.99. From my experience, the slightly higher price of the Pax Plus is justified by its compact design and the convenience it offers for on-the-go use. However, the Arizer XQ2, being more affordable, also provides exceptional value with its advanced features like the large color display and customizable session settings. This affordability combined with high functionality makes the XQ2 stand out in terms of value for money.

Winner: Arizer XQ2
The Arizer XQ2 wins in the price category due to its affordability and comprehensive features. I rate the Pax Plus 4 out of 5 for its price, considering its premium build and features, while the Arizer XQ2 gets a 4.5 out of 5 for offering advanced features at a more accessible price point.

Heating Method and Time

The Pax Plus utilizes conduction heating and has a heat-up time of 20-30 seconds, while the Arizer XQ2 uses a convection method with a heat-up time ranging from 10-20 seconds. From my experience, the Arizer XQ2’s convection heating provides a more even and efficient vaporization of the herbs, resulting in a superior flavor and vapor quality. The faster heat-up time of the XQ2 also adds to its convenience, making it more suitable for quick sessions.

Winner: Arizer XQ2
I rate the Pax Plus 3.5 out of 5 for its heating method and time, as conduction heating can sometimes lead to uneven vaporization. The Arizer XQ2 scores a 4.5 out of 5, with its efficient convection heating providing a noticeable improvement in vapor quality and a quicker readiness time.

Temperature Settings and Control

The Pax Plus offers four preset temperature settings, whereas the Arizer XQ2 boasts a temperature range of 122-500°F with precise 1-degree control. From my experience, the precise temperature control of the XQ2 allows for a more tailored vaping experience, especially for users who are particular about their vapor’s flavor and density. The broader temperature range also makes the XQ2 more versatile for different types of herbs and user preferences.

Winner: Arizer XQ2
In terms of temperature control, the Pax Plus earns a 3.5 out of 5 due to its limited preset options. The Arizer XQ2, on the other hand, receives a 4.5 out of 5 for its wide and precise temperature range, catering to a more customized vaping experience.

Design and Portability

The Pax Plus, with its metal body and compact dimensions (3.85 in x 1.22 in x .86 in), is designed for discreet and portable use. In contrast, the Arizer XQ2, while sleek, is more suited for stationary use due to its larger size (16.0 × 16.0 × 16.2 cm) and dependence on an outlet for power. From my experience, the Pax Plus stands out for its portability and ease of use in various settings, from outdoor adventures to social gatherings.

Winner: Pax Plus
For design and portability, the Pax Plus scores a solid 4.5 out of 5. Its compact size and durable construction make it ideal for on-the-go vaping. The Arizer XQ2, though stylish, gets a 3 out of 5 in this category due to its larger size and less portability.

Vapor Quality

Vapor quality is paramount in any vaping experience. The Pax Plus, with its conduction heating, provides dense, smooth vapor, especially noticeable in its Boost and Stealth modes. The Arizer XQ2, with its convection heating and high-quality glass components, offers a remarkably clean and flavorful vapor. From my experience, the purity and taste of the vapor produced by the XQ2 are unparalleled, making it a clear winner in this category.

Winner: Arizer XQ2
Rating the Pax Plus at 4 out of 5 for its dense and smooth vapor, it’s the Arizer XQ2 that takes the lead with a 4.5 out of 5 for its exceptional vapor quality, thanks to its advanced convection heating and high-quality components.

Battery Life and Charging

The Pax Plus is equipped with a 3500mAh internal battery, offering 6-9 sessions per charge, and a charge time of 2-3 hours. The Arizer XQ2, however, relies on an outlet for power and does not have an internal battery. From my experience, the Pax Plus’s battery life is a significant advantage for users who prefer mobility and don’t always have access to a power outlet. Its ability to hold a charge for multiple sessions makes it highly convenient for extended use.

Winner: Pax Plus
In the battery life and charging category, the Pax Plus earns a 4.5 out of 5 due to its reliable battery life and the convenience of not being tethered to a power outlet. The Arizer XQ2, lacking a battery, scores a 2.5 out of 5 as it restricts usage to locations with power access.

User Interface and Controls

The Pax Plus operates with LED indicators and a single-button control system, offering a more minimalistic approach. The Arizer XQ2, on the other hand, features a user-friendly operating system with a large color LCD display, making it easier to monitor and adjust settings. From my experience, the Arizer XQ2’s display and controls provide a more intuitive and informative user experience, especially for beginners or those who prefer more detailed feedback during use.

Winner: Arizer XQ2
For user interface and controls, the Pax Plus is rated 3.5 out of 5, as its simplistic design might not cater to everyone’s needs. The Arizer XQ2 scores a 4.5 out of 5 for its advanced and user-friendly interface.

Durability and Build Quality

The Pax Plus boasts a metal body and silicone mouthpiece, designed for durability and a premium feel. The Arizer XQ2, with its black metal cover and high-quality glass components, also demonstrates a commitment to quality and robustness. From my experience, both devices show excellent build quality, but the Pax Plus’s metal body provides an added sense of sturdiness and resilience, which is especially important for a portable device.

Winner: Pax Plus
In terms of durability and build quality, I rate the Pax Plus at 4.5 out of 5 for its robust construction. The Arizer XQ2 also receives a respectable 4 out of 5, thanks to its quality materials and design.

Warranty and Customer Service

The Pax Plus comes with a substantial 10-year warranty, showcasing the company’s confidence in its product. The Arizer XQ2 offers a 3-year warranty, which is commendable but doesn’t match the length of the Pax Plus. From my experience, a longer warranty period like that of the Pax Plus provides greater peace of mind and reflects the manufacturer’s commitment to their product’s longevity.

Winner: Pax Plus
For warranty and customer service, the Pax Plus scores a 4.5 out of 5, thanks to its extensive 10-year warranty. The Arizer XQ2 is rated at 3.5 out of 5, offering a decent but comparatively shorter warranty period.

Stealth and Efficiency Modes

The Pax Plus offers a Stealth Mode for minimal vapor and added discretion, and an Efficiency Mode for a gradual temperature increase, suitable for extended sessions. The Arizer XQ2, although it does not specifically label these modes, allows for a wide range of temperature settings that can be adjusted to achieve similar results. From my experience, the dedicated Stealth and Efficiency modes of the Pax Plus provide a more user-friendly experience for those specific needs, especially for users who prioritize discretion or efficiency in their sessions.

Winner: Pax Plus
I rate the Pax Plus 4.5 out of 5 for its specifically designed modes that cater to various user preferences. The Arizer XQ2, while versatile, gets a 3.5 out of 5 in this aspect due to the lack of dedicated modes for stealth and efficiency.

Mobile App Compatibility

Neither the Pax Plus nor the Arizer XQ2 offers mobile app compatibility. This feature could enhance the user experience by allowing additional customization and control via a smartphone. From my experience, the lack of a mobile app for both devices isn’t a significant drawback, as they both offer adequate control through their respective interfaces. However, the inclusion of a mobile app could be a beneficial addition for tech-savvy users.

Winner: Tie
Both the Pax Plus and the Arizer XQ2 received 3 out of 5 in this category. While they function well without an app, the addition of mobile app compatibility could enhance the overall user experience.

Heating Modes and Flavor Quality

The Pax Plus provides four preset heating modes, including a Flavor Mode that initiates heating based on inhalation, enhancing the taste profiles. The Arizer XQ2’s precise temperature control allows users to find their optimal setting for flavor. From my experience, the Flavor Mode of the Pax Plus is particularly effective for those who prioritize taste in their vaping experience. However, the Arizer XQ2’s precise control also offers excellent flavor quality by finding the perfect temperature for different herbs.

Winner: Tie
In terms of heating modes and flavor quality, both devices score a 4 out of 5. The Pax Plus is for its specialized Flavor Mode, and the Arizer XQ2 is for its customizable temperature settings that cater well to flavor enthusiasts.

Oven Material and Capacity

Both the Pax Plus and the Arizer XQ2 feature stainless steel ovens with a capacity of 0.5 grams. Stainless steel is known for its durability and even heat distribution, contributing to efficient vaporization. From my experience, both devices perform well in terms of oven quality, ensuring a consistent and enjoyable vaping experience.

Winner: Tie
For oven material and capacity, both the Pax Plus and the Arizer XQ2 are rated at 4.5 out of 5. Their stainless steel ovens provide a reliable and effective vaping experience.

Haptic Feedback Technology

The Pax Plus is equipped with haptic feedback technology, providing a tactile response to user interactions, which enhances the overall user experience. The Arizer XQ2, however, does not have this feature. From my experience, the haptic feedback in the Pax Plus adds a level of intuitiveness and modernity to the device, making it more user-friendly, especially in situations where visual or auditory cues are not ideal.

Winner: Pax Plus
I rate the Pax Plus 4.5 out of 5 for its incorporation of haptic feedback, which adds to the device’s ease of use and modern feel. The Arizer XQ2, lacking this feature, receives a 3 out of 5 in this category.

Display and Visual Feedback

The Pax Plus utilizes LED indicators for its display, providing a minimalist and intuitive visual feedback system. The Arizer XQ2, on the other hand, features a large, easy-to-read color LCD display, offering more detailed information and settings visibility. From my experience, the LCD display of the Arizer XQ2 offers a more comprehensive and user-friendly interface, especially for those who prefer a more interactive and informative approach to adjusting and monitoring their device.

Winner: Arizer XQ2
In terms of display and visual feedback, I rate the Pax Plus 3.5 out of 5 for its simple yet effective LED system. The Arizer XQ2 scores higher with a 4.5 out of 5 for its detailed and user-friendly LCD display.

Custom Session Settings

Customization is key for many users, and this is where the Arizer XQ2 shines with its upgraded custom session settings, including temperature alert, delay start, and shut-off timer. The Pax Plus, while offering four preset temperature settings and modes, lacks the same level of customization. From my experience, the ability to tailor every aspect of the vaping session in the XQ2 greatly enhances the user experience, especially for those who have specific preferences or needs.

Winner: Arizer XQ2
I rate the Pax Plus 3.5 out of 5 for its basic but user-friendly presets. The Arizer XQ2, with its extensive customization options, earns a 4.5 out of 5, catering to a more personalized vaping experience.

Charging Options and Flexibility

The Pax Plus features a magnetic USB charging dock, providing a convenient and sleek charging method. The Arizer XQ2, being a desktop vaporizer, relies on a standard power adapter. From my experience, the convenience of the Pax Plus’s magnetic USB charging is a significant advantage, offering ease of charging and compatibility with common USB ports.

Winner: Pax Plus
In the charging options and flexibility category, the Pax Plus scores a 4.5 out of 5 for its convenient and modern charging method. The Arizer XQ2 gets a 3.5 out of 5, as it requires a specific power source and is less versatile in terms of charging options.

Size and Weight

Portability is often an important factor for many users. The Pax Plus, weighing 91g with dimensions of 3.85 in x 1.22 in x .86 in, is highly portable and easy to carry. The Arizer XQ2, at a larger size of 16.0 × 16.0 × 16.2 cm and a weight of 500 g, is more suited for stationary use. From my experience, the compact size and lightweight nature of the Pax Plus make it ideal for users who are always on the move and need a device that can easily fit in their pocket or bag.

Winner: Pax Plus
For size and weight, the Pax Plus is rated at 4.5 out of 5, excelling in portability. The Arizer XQ2, due to its larger and heavier design, scores a 3 out of 5 in this category, being more suitable for home use.

Compatibility with Dry Herbs and Extracts

The Pax Plus is designed to be compatible with both dry herbs and extracts, offering versatility for different types of users. The Arizer XQ2, primarily focused on dry herb use, may not offer the same level of versatility for extract enthusiasts. From my experience, the ability of the Pax Plus to efficiently handle both dry herbs and extracts adds significant value for users who enjoy both forms of vaping.

Winner: Pax Plus
In terms of compatibility with dry herbs and extracts, the Pax Plus earns a 4.5 out of 5 for its versatility. The Arizer XQ2, being more specialized, receives a 3.5 out of 5 in this aspect.

Comparison Table

FeaturePax PlusArizer XQ2
Heating MethodConductionConvection
Heat Up Time20-30s10-20s
Battery Capacity3500mAhN/A (Power outlet required)
Session Per Charge6-9N/A
Temperature Settings4 Levels122-500°F (Precise 1-degree control)
DisplayLED IndicatorsLarge Color LCD
Mobile App CompatibilityNoNo
Haptic FeedbackYesNo
Oven MaterialStainless SteelStainless Steel
Oven Capacity0.5gr0.5gr
Dimensions3.85 in x 1.22 in x .86 in16.0 × 16.0 × 16.2 cm
Warranty10 Years3 Years
Charging TypeMagnetic USB DockPower Adapter
Stealth ModeYesN/A (Customizable temp. for stealth)
Efficiency ModeYesN/A (Customizable temp. for efficiency)
Flavor ModeYesN/A (Customizable temp. for flavor)
Boost ModeYesN/A
CompatibilityDry Herb, ExtractsDry Herbs
DesignCompact and PortableLarger and Stationary
Additional AccessoriesMouthpieces, Oven Lids, Multi-tool, Maintenance KitRemote Control, Herb Bowls, Whip, Balloon Bags, etc.
Vapor QualityDense, Smooth VaporClean, Flavorful Vapor
Custom Session SettingsNoYes
User InterfaceMinimalisticComprehensive
Build QualityDurable Metal BodySleek Metal with Glass Components
PortabilityHighModerate (Stationary)

Frequently Asked Questions

How Long Does the Battery Last on the Pax Plus?

The Pax Plus offers a battery life that supports 6-9 sessions per charge, depending on usage intensity and temperature settings. Its 3500mAh battery takes 2-3 hours to charge fully.

Can the Arizer XQ2 be Used with Extracts?

The Arizer XQ2 is primarily designed for dry herb use. While it excels in this area, it is not specifically built for use with extracts, unlike the Pax Plus which accommodates both dry herbs and extracts.

What is the Warranty Period for the Pax Plus and the Arizer XQ2?

The Pax Plus comes with a substantial 10-year warranty, demonstrating the company’s confidence in their product’s durability. Meanwhile, the Arizer XQ2 offers a 3-year warranty, ensuring customer satisfaction and product reliability.

Does the Arizer XQ2 Have a Mobile App for Control?

No, the Arizer XQ2 does not have mobile app compatibility. It instead features a user-friendly operating system with a large color LCD for easy control and customization.

Are the Temperature Settings Adjustable in the Pax Plus?

The Pax Plus offers four preset temperature settings, providing a range of options for different vaping preferences. However, it does not allow for precise temperature control like the Arizer XQ2.

How Portable is the Arizer XQ2 Compared to the Pax Plus?

The Arizer XQ2 is larger and designed for stationary use, measuring 16.0 × 16.0 × 16.2 cm and weighing 500g. In contrast, the Pax Plus is highly portable, with its compact size (3.85 in x 1.22 in x .86 in) and lighter weight (91g).

Can the Pax Plus be Used While Charging?

The Pax Plus should not be used while charging. It’s recommended to fully charge the device before use, which typically takes 2-3 hours.

What Type of Heating Method is Used in the Arizer XQ2?

The Arizer XQ2 utilizes advanced ceramic convection heating technology, offering precise 1-degree temperature control for efficient and even vapor production.

Does the Pax Plus Offer a Flavor Mode?

Yes, the Pax Plus includes a Flavor Mode, which is initiated by inhalation, enhancing the taste profiles and overall vapor quality, especially suitable for users who prioritize flavor.

What Accessories Come with the Arizer XQ2?

The Arizer XQ2 comes with a range of accessories, including remote control, herb bowls, a whip, balloon bags, and more, offering a comprehensive package for various vaping preferences and styles.

Final Verdict

After thoroughly comparing the Pax Plus and the Arizer XQ2, it’s clear that both vaporizers have their unique strengths catering to different user needs. The Pax Plus stands out for its portability, sleek design, and versatility in handling both dry herbs and extracts.

Its quick heat-up time, haptic feedback, and efficient battery life make it an excellent choice for on-the-go vaping enthusiasts. On the other hand, the Arizer XQ2 shines in its precision temperature control, advanced ceramic convection heating, and comprehensive user interface. Its larger size and power outlet dependency make it more suited for stationary use, but it excels in delivering a high-quality, customizable vaping experience.

In conclusion, if you prioritize mobility and a versatile, user-friendly device, the Pax Plus is the way to go. However, for those who prefer a more customizable, stationary vaping experience with advanced features, the Arizer XQ2 is the ideal choice. Both devices offer robust build quality and reliable performance, making them top contenders in their respective categories.

Leave a Comment